LSAT

Comprehensive study of LSAT covering fundamental concepts and advanced applications.

Logical Reasoning FundamentalsAnalytical Reasoning (Logic Games)Reading Comprehension Basics
Advanced Argument StructureConditional Reasoning and ContrapositivesRecognizing Logical Fallacies
Applying LSAT Logic to Everyday DecisionsProblem Solving in Legal ScenariosCritical Reading in Academic and Professional Life
Time Management on the LSATElimination and Guessing Techniques
Logical Reasoning Fu...Analytical Reasoning...Reading Comprehensio...Advanced Argument St...Conditional Reasonin...Recognizing Logical ...Applying LSAT Logic ...Problem Solving in L...Critical Reading in ...Time Management on t...Elimination and Gues...
Advanced Topics

Conditional Reasoning and Contrapositives

What is Conditional Reasoning?

Many LSAT questions use "if-then" statements. Understanding how to manipulate and negate these is key.

  • If A, then B: If you see A, you must see B.
  • Contrapositive: If not B, then not A.

Diagramming Conditionals

Use arrows (A → B) and practice converting to contrapositives (¬B → ¬A).

Common Pitfalls

  • Don’t confuse the inverse with the contrapositive!
  • Watch for “unless,” “only if,” and other tricky wording.

Why It’s Important

Lawyers use conditional logic to interpret laws and contracts every day.

Key Formula

\[A \rightarrow B \implies eg B \rightarrow eg A\]

Examples

  • Translating a statute’s requirements into logic diagrams.

  • Spotting errors in arguments that reverse or negate conditionals.

In a Nutshell

Unlock the power of ‘if-then’ logic for ironclad legal reasoning.

Key Terms

Contrapositive
The logical equivalent of a conditional statement, reversing and negating both terms.
Next
Recognizing Logical Fallacies