Card 0 of 16
Adapted from Treasure Island by Robert Louis Stevenson (1883)
He was a very silent man by custom. All day he hung round the cove or upon the cliffs with a brass telescope; all evening he sat in a corner of the parlor next the fire and drank rum and water very strong. Mostly he would not speak when spoken to, only look up sudden and fierce and blow through his nose like a fog-horn; and we and the people who came about our house soon learned to let him be. Every day when he came back from his stroll he would ask if any seafaring men had gone by along the road.
I was far less afraid of the captain than anybody else who knew him. There were nights when he would sometimes sit and sing his wicked, old, wild sea-songs, minding nobody; but sometimes he would call for glasses round and force all the trembling company to listen to his stories or bear a chorus to his singing. His stories were what frightened people worst of all. Dreadful stories they were—about hanging, and walking the plank, and storms at sea, and the Dry Tortugas, and wild deeds and places on the Spanish Main. By his own account he must have lived his life among some of the wickedest men upon the sea, and the language in which he told these stories shocked our plain country people almost as much as the crimes that he described. My father was always saying the inn would be ruined, for people would soon cease coming there to be tyrannized over and put down, and sent shivering to their beds; but I really believe his presence did us good. People were frightened at the time, but on looking back they rather liked it; it was a fine excitement in a quiet country life, and there was even a party of the younger men who pretended to admire him, calling him a "true sea-dog" and a "real old salt" and such like names, and saying there was the sort of man that made England terrible at sea.
Which of the following best summarizes the passage?
In order to summarize the passage, the correct answer choice has to reflect each part of the passage's events. It should somehow specifically relate to each paragraph, not just one of them, and it shouldn't be too general. For example, "The captain tells scary stories to a group of guests." is not correct because it only refers to events that happen in the second paragraph. It says nothing about the first paragraph, so it misses part of the passage and isn't the best summary. "The narrator describes his family's inn" and "The captain arrives at the narrator's home, an inn" simply don't accurately describe what happens in the passage. "The captain watches the surrounding area for other sailors" only describes the last line of the first paragraph. The best answer is "The narrator describes the mannerisms of the captain and the interactions the narrator has had with him." This statement applies to both paragraphs.
Compare your answer with the correct one above
Adapted from "The Cask of Amontillado" by Edgar Allan Poe (1846)
The thousand injuries of Fortunato I had borne as I best could, but when he ventured upon insult I vowed revenge. You, who so well know the nature of my soul, will not suppose, however, that I gave utterance to a threat. At length I would be avenged; this was a point definitively settled — but the very definitiveness with which it was resolved precluded the idea of risk. I must not only punish but punish with impunity1. A wrong is unredressed2 when retribution overtakes its redresser. It is equally unredressed when the avenger fails to make himself felt as such to him who has done the wrong.
It must be understood that neither by word nor deed had I given Fortunato cause to doubt my good will. I continued, as was my wont, to smile in his face, and he did not perceive that my smile now was at the thought of his immolation3.
He had a weak point — this Fortunato — although in other regards he was a man to be respected and even feared. He prided himself upon his connoisseurship in wine. Few Italians have the true virtuoso spirit. For the most part their enthusiasm is adopted to suit the time and opportunity, to practice imposture upon the British and Austrian millionaires. In painting and gemmary, Fortunato, like his countrymen, was a quack, but in the matter of old wines he was sincere. In this respect I did not differ from him materially; — I was skillful in the Italian vintages myself, and bought largely whenever I could.
It was about dusk, one evening during the supreme madness of the carnival season, that I encountered my friend. He accosted me with excessive warmth, for he had been drinking much. The man wore motley. He had on a tight-fitting parti-striped dress, and his head was surmounted by the conical cap and bells. I was so pleased to see him that I thought I should never have done wringing his hand.
I said to him — “My dear Fortunato, you are luckily met. How remarkably well you are looking today. But I have received a pipe of what passes for Amontillado, and I have my doubts.”
“How?” said he. “Amontillado? A pipe? Impossible! And in the middle of the carnival!”
“I have my doubts,” I replied; “and I was silly enough to pay the full Amontillado price without consulting you in the matter. You were not to be found, and I was fearful of losing a bargain.”
“Amontillado!”
“I have my doubts.”
“Amontillado!”
“And I must satisfy them.”
“Amontillado!”
“As you are engaged, I am on my way to Luchresi. If any one has a critical turn it is he. He will tell me ——”
“Luchresi cannot tell Amontillado from Sherry4.”
“And yet some fools will have it that his taste is a match for your own.”
“Come, let us go.”
“Whither?”
“To your vaults.”
1. "Impunity," n. immunity from punishment
2. The verb "redress," not directly used in the passage, means to amend or rectify a wrong
3. "Immolation," n. utter destruction, esp. that of a sacrificial victim by being burned
4. "Sherry," n. a type of fortified wine
Which of the following provides the strongest evidence that Fortunato is shocked by and interested in the narrator's purchasing of the amontillado?
Many of the answer choices to this question present evidence that Fortunato is shocked by and interested in the narrator's amontillado, but we're looking for the strongest piece of evidence. The narrator's statement comes well before Fortunato learns about the narrator having obtained the amontillado, so it's probably not the strongest evidence of his reaction to learning about it. The fact that Fortunato immediately asks how the narrator obtained the amontillado demonstrates his interest, but doesn't really attest to his shock. Fortunato's comment about Luchresi has nothing to do with him being shocked by the news that the narrator has obtained a cask of amontillado, either. The fact that the story takes place during the carnival doesn't attest to Fortunato's particular reaction. The best answer is that Fortunato repeats "Amontillado!" three times; this shows that he is shocked by and interested in the narrator's purchasing of it.
Compare your answer with the correct one above
Adapted from “When I Heard the Learn’d Astronomer” in Leaves of Grass by Walt Whitman (1865; 1900)
When I heard the learn’d astronomer,
When the proofs, the figures, were ranged in columns before me,
When I was shown the charts and diagrams, to add, divide, and measure them,
When I sitting heard the astronomer where he lectured with much applause in the lecture-room
How soon unaccountable I became tired and sick,
Till rising and gliding out I wander’d off by myself,
In the mystical moist night-air, and from time to time,
Look’d up in perfect silence at the stars.
Which of the following statements best summarizes the theme of this poem?
Before we consider the answer choices, let's consider what actually happens in the poem, line by line. Doing this is a good first step in working our way from the specific events that take place to understanding the more abstract general theme of the poem.
The narrator relates how he heard an astronomer talk (Lines 1–4). The poem is a bit repetitive here. Part of the poem takes place in a lecture room, where people applaud the astronomer (Line 4). Then, the narrator becomes "tired and sick" (Line 5) until he goes outside into nature (Lines 6–7) and looks at the stars by himself (Line 8).
What can we make out of that? The narrator doesn't seem to get much out of listening to the astronomer. The astronomer may be very "learn'd"—that is, well-studied—but the narrator seems to prefer looking at the stars on his own than listening to all of the mathematical details about astronomy.
Now let's look over the answer choices and see which one fits with our observations. "Everyone should take time to go star-gazing" could be the correct answer, but the narrator never urges the reader to do anything; he just recounts his personal experience. "Astronomers should give more entertaining lectures" is another general takeaway that doesn't really fit our observations. A lot more seems to be going on in this poem; the best answer needs to connect what happens in the first part of the poem (the narrator listening to the astronomer) with the second part (the narrator looking at the stars), and neither of the two answer choices we have considered do that. "Mathematics is far more interesting than astronomy since it is more abstract" isn't the case, as this is not what the poem suggests at all. At no point does the narrator contrast mathematics against astronomy.
This leaves us with "Only by understanding the scientific laws governing the natural world can you truly appreciate nature" and "You can appreciate nature without studying it mathematically." Which of these is the poem arguing? The narrator doesn't seem to rely on anything he learned from the astronomer at the end of the poem; he's just looking up at the stars on his own, without specific mathematical knowledge of them. The best answer is "You can appreciate nature without studying it mathematically," as this reflects the narrator's experience.
Compare your answer with the correct one above
Adapted from “Introduced Species That Have Become Pests” in Our Vanishing Wild Life, Its Extermination and Protection by William Temple Hornaday (1913)
The man who successfully introduces into a new habitat any species of living thing assumes a very grave responsibility. Every introduced species is doubtful gravel until panned out. The enormous losses that have been inflicted upon the world through the perpetuation of follies with wild animals and plants would, if added together, be enough to purchase a principality. The most aggravating feature of these follies in transplantation is that never yet have they been made severely punishable. We are just as careless and easygoing on this point as we were about the government of Yellowstone Park in the days when Howell and other poachers destroyed our first national bison herd. Even though Howell was caught red-handed, skinning seven Park bison cows, he could not be punished for it, because there was no penalty prescribed by any law. Today, there is a way in which any revengeful person could inflict enormous damage on the entire South, at no cost to himself, involve those states in enormous losses and the expenditure of vast sums of money, yet go absolutely unpunished!
The gypsy moth is a case in point. This winged calamity was imported near Boston by a French entomologist, Mr. Leopold Trouvelot, in 1868 or 69. The scientist did not purposely set the pest free. He was endeavoring with live specimens to find a moth that would produce a cocoon of commercial value to America, and a sudden gust of wind blew his living and breeding specimens of the gypsy moth out of his study through an open window. The moth itself is not bad to look at, but its larvae is a great, overgrown brute with an appetite like a hog. Immediately Mr. Trouvelot sought to recover his specimens. When he failed to find them all, he notified the State authorities of the accident. Every effort was made to recover all the specimens, but enough escaped to produce progeny that soon became a scourge to the trees of Massachusetts. The method of the big, nasty-looking mottled-brown caterpillar was very simple. It devoured the entire foliage of every tree that grew in its sphere of influence.
The gypsy moth spread with alarming rapidity and persistence. In time, the state of Massachusetts was forced to begin a relentless war upon it, by poisonous sprays and by fire. It was awful! Up to this date (1912) the New England states and the United States Government service have expended in fighting this pest about $7,680,000!
The spread of this pest has been slowed, but the gypsy moth never will be wholly stamped out. Today it exists in Rhode Island, Connecticut, and New Hampshire, and it is due to reach New York at an early date. It is steadily spreading in three directions from Boston, its original point of departure, and when it strikes the State of New York, we, too, will begin to pay dearly for the Trouvelot experiment.
The underlined sentence in the second paragraph (“The moth itself is not bad to look at, but its larvae is a great, overgrown brute with an appetite like a hog.”) introduces a supporting idea concerning the moth’s destructive potential. In which of the following sentences is that idea developed further?
What do we learn about the gypsy moth in this particular sentence? We learn that the moth is somewhat nice to look at, according to the author: "The moth itself is not bad to look at." That doesn't seem relevant at all to its destructive potential. What else do we learn? The author adds that "its larvae is a great, overgrown brute," so it sounds like it is rather large for a caterpillar. That's doesn't seem that relevant either. The sentence concludes with the phrase, ". . . with an appetite like a hog." Aha! That's significant. In comparing the caterpillar's appetite to a hog's (pig's), the author is saying that gypsy moth caterpillars have large appetites and each eat a lot. Caterpillars often eat plants, so this tells us that the gypsy moth caterpillars can consume a lot of leaves.
We now need to identify the sentence in the passage in which this supporting idea—the large appetites of gypsy moth caterpillars—is developed. The only answer choice that has to do with the appetites of gypsy moth caterpillars is "It devoured the entire foliage of every tree that grew in its sphere of influence." This is the correct answer. The idea of the caterpillars eating a lot introduced earlier in the paragraph in the underlined sentence supports the claim that they "devoured the entire foliage of every tree" that they could get to.
Compare your answer with the correct one above
Adapted from "Save the Redwoods" by John Muir in Sierra Club Bulletin Volume XI Number 1 (January 1920)
Forty-seven years ago one of these Calaveras Sequoias was laboriously cut down, that the stump might be had for a dancing-floor. Another, one of the finest in the grove, was skinned alive to a height of one hundred and sixteen feet and the bark sent to London to show how fine and big that Calaveras tree was—as sensible a scheme as skinning our great men would be to prove their greatness. Now some millmen want to cut all the Calaveras trees into lumber and money. No doubt these trees would make good lumber after passing through a sawmill, as George Washington after passing through the hands of a French cook would have made good food. But both for Washington and the tree that bears his name higher uses have been found.
Could one of these Sequoia Kings come to town in all its godlike majesty so as to be strikingly seen and allowed to plead its own cause, there would never again be any lack of defenders. And the same may be said of all the other Sequoia groves and forests of the Sierra with their companions and the noble Sequoia sempervirens, or redwood, of the coast mountains.
In these noble groves and forests to the southward of the Calaveras Grove the axe and saw have long been busy, and thousands of the finest Sequoias have been felled, blasted into manageable dimensions, and sawed into lumber by methods destructive almost beyond belief, while fires have spread still wider and more lamentable ruin. In the course of my explorations twenty-five years ago, I found five sawmills located on or near the lower margin of the Sequoia belt, all of which were cutting more or less \[Sequoia gigantea\] lumber, which looks like the redwood of the coast, and was sold as redwood. One of the smallest of these mills in the season of 1874 sawed two million feet of Sequoia lumber. Since that time other mills have been built among the Sequoias, notably the large ones on Kings River and the head of the Fresno. The destruction of these grand trees is still going on. These kings of the forest, the noblest of a noble species, rightly belong to the world, but as they are in California we cannot escape responsibility as their guardians.
Any fool can destroy trees. They cannot defend themselves or run away. And few destroyers of trees ever plant any; nor can planting avail much toward restoring our grand aboriginal giants. It took more than three thousand years to make some of the oldest of the Sequoias, trees that are still standing in perfect strength and beauty, waving and singing in the mighty forests of the Sierra.
Throughout the passage, the author personifies Sequoia trees in order to elicit the reader's empathy for them. Personification is the act of describing a non-human thing as being or acting human in some way. In which of the following excerpts does the author NOT personify Sequoia trees?
Personification is the act of making a non-human thing seem human by giving it human traits, making it appear sentient, and/or portray it as performing human actions. Let's see which of the answer choices does NOT do this.
"These kings of the forest, the noblest of a noble species, rightly belong to the world, but as they are in California we cannot escape responsibility as their guardians." - The author refers to the trees as "kings of the forest," and kings are human, so this is a type of personification.
" . . . trees that are still standing in perfect strength and beauty, waving and singing in the mighty forests of the Sierra." - The author uses some subtle personification in this sentence in claiming that the trees are "singing." Trees can't "sing"—only people can.
"Could one of these Sequoia Kings come to town in all its godlike majesty so as to be strikingly seen and allowed to plead its own cause, there would never again be any lack of defenders." - Here, the author directly imagines a Sequoia tree actively journeying into town "to plead its own cause," which is overt personification.
"Another, one of the finest in the grove, was skinned alive to a height of one hundred and sixteen feet . . ." - In describing the removal of the tree's bark as it being "skinned alive," the author describes it in a human way. Trees have bark, not skin, and the author uses this statement to lead into a direct comparison between great trees and great people.
"Forty-seven years ago one of these Calaveras Sequoias was laboriously cut down, that the stump might be had for a dancing-floor." - This is the correct answer. Nowhere in the underlined excerpt does the author portray the tree as having any human traits or performing any actions that it could not actually perform.
Compare your answer with the correct one above
Adapted from “Feathers of Sea Birds and Wild Fowl for Bedding” from The Utility of Birds by Edward Forbush (ed. 1922)
In the colder countries of the world, the feathers and down of waterfowl have been in great demand for centuries. These materials have been used as filling for beds and pillows. Such feathers are perfect insulators of heat, and beds, pillows, or coverlets filled with them represent the acme of comfort and durability.
The early settlers of New England saved for such purposes the feathers and down from the thousands of wild-fowl which they killed, but as the population of people increased, the quantity of feathers furnished in this manner became insufficient, and the people sought a larger supply in the vast colonies of ducks and geese along the Labrador coast.
The manner in which the feathers and down were obtained, unlike the method practiced in Iceland, did not tend to conserve and protect the source of supply. In Iceland, the people have continued to receive for many years a considerable income by collecting eider down (the small, fluffy feathers of eider ducks), but there they do not “kill the goose that lays the golden eggs.” Ducks line their nests with down plucked from their own breasts and that of the eider is particularly valuable for bedding. In Iceland, these birds are so carefully protected that they have become as tame and unsuspicious as domestic fowls In North America. Where they are constantly hunted they often conceal their nests in the midst of weeds or bushes, but in Iceland, they make their nests and deposit their eggs in holes dug for them in the sod. A supply of the ducks is maintained so that the people derive from them an annual income.
In North America, quite a different policy was pursued. The demand for feathers became so great in the New England colonies during the middle of the eighteenth century that vessels were sent to Labrador for the express purpose of securing the feathers and down of wild fowl. Eider down having become valuable and these ducks being in the habit of congregating by thousands on barren islands of the Labrador coast, the birds became the victims of the ships’ crews. As the ducks molt all their primary feathers at once in July or August and are then quite incapable of flight and the young birds are unable to fly until well grown, the hunters were able to surround the helpless birds, drive them together, and kill them with clubs. Otis says that millions of wildfowl were thus destroyed and that in a few years their haunts were so broken up by this wholesale slaughter and their numbers were so diminished that feather voyages became unprofitable and were given up.
This practice, followed by the almost continual egging, clubbing, shooting, etc. by Labrador fishermen, may have been a chief factor in the extinction of the Labrador duck. No doubt had the eider duck been restricted in its breeding range to the islands of Labrador, it also would have been exterminated long ago.
Which of the following best states the main idea of this passage?
Questions that ask about a passage’s main idea need to encompass each of the topics it discusses while not describing them in a way that is too broad. We can ignore any answer choices that only describe parts of the passage—here, “The feathers and down of ducks is valuable as a source of bedding, leading to its collection from ducks,” “The extinction of the Labrador duck can be traced to a definite cause,” and “The Icelandic people collect eider down in an efficient and reasonable way.” This leaves us with “Natural resources are precious,” which is far too broad to accurately describe the passage’s main idea, and the correct answer, “The feathers and down of ducks is a valuable resource, and the North American and Icelandic methods of collecting it have had vastly different consequences."
Compare your answer with the correct one above
Until recently, there were two schools of thought on establishing "flagship" endangered species chosen for campaigns to make people aware of the need for action to protect animals from extinction. These flagship species are used in marketing and advertising not only to raise awareness but also to encourage people to take action - such as fundraising, voting, and recruiting others to join in - for fauna conservation as a whole.
The first concerns how recognizable the general public, the audience of most large-scale funding campaigns, finds a particular species. This concept is commonly termed its “public awareness.” This school of thought was built on the foundation that if an individual recognizes a species from prior knowledge, cultural context, or previous conservational and educational encounters (in a zoo environment or classroom setting, for instance) that individual would be more likely to note and respond to the severity of its endangered status. For instance, the panda bear, a known and beloved animal of both historical and pop-culture significance, has long been used as a flagship species for many conservation groups. However, recently emerging flagship species such as the pangolin have shown us that this cannot be the only factor.
Alongside public awareness, conservation experts have long considered a factor they refer to as a “keystone species” designation in the flagstone selection process. Keystone species are those species that play an especially important role in their respective habitats or ecosystems. The otter, for example, plays a key role in balancing the kelp ecosystems in which it hunts. While this metric is important to the environmentalists in charge of distributing funds received, recent data has expressed the more minor role a keystone species designation seems to play in the motivations of the public.
Recent studies by conservationists have questioned both the singularity and the extent to which the above classifications impact the decision making of the general public. Though more complicated to measure, a third designation, known as a species’ “charisma,” is now the yardstick by which most flagship species are classified. Addressing the charisma of a species involves establishing and collecting data concerning its ecological (interactions with humans/the environments of humans), aesthetic (appealing to human emotions through physical appearance and immediately related behaviors), and corporeal (affection and socialization with humans over the short- and long-terms) characteristics. This process has been understandably criticized by some for its costs and failure to incorporate the severity of an endangered species’ status into designation, but its impact on the public has been unquestionable. While keystone and public awareness designations are still often applied in the field because of their practicality and comparative simplicity, charisma is now commonly accepted as the most accurate metric with which to judge a species’ flagship potential.
The primary purpose of this passage is to
In this case, we need to think about *why* the author has developed this passage. Is the author attempting to make a case for charisma as a designation process? Certainly not! We were told in the passage that this has already become the commonly accepted process! Though some elements of the passage speak about characteristics of each of the three methods cited, a direct comparison/contrast is never made, and would not encompass the purpose of the passage as a whole. Nor has the author developed the passage to directly criticize the negative feedback received. While it might be true that the author agrees that conservation is an important cause worthy of support, the tone and purpose of the passage do not align with "make the case that the conservation of endangered species is an important cause worthy of public support". The author is attempting to dig into the context and implications of the general transition being made toward the use of charisma as a primary designation - thus “analyze the factors that contribute to the effectiveness of a flagship endangered species for conservation campaigns” is the correct answer.
Compare your answer with the correct one above
When you hear the word “pirate,” you likely think of names such as Blackbeard or Henry Morgan. However, there exists a vast and interesting history of lesser-known pirates who have also shaped the term as we know it, and this history is just as deserving of our attention.
For instance, in the fifteenth century, the pirate Pier Gerlofs Donia, better known as “Big Pier,” fought tirelessly against the Roman Empire and intimidated even the most fierce army men with the seven foot long sword he wielded, known as the “Zweihander.” When his crew captured a suspected enemy ship, he was known to determine friend from foe by forcing them to say: “Butter, bread, and green cheese: if you can’t say that, you’re not a real Frisian!” in his native tongue, as this was often difficult for enemies to pronounce correctly. Enemies who were unable to do so were sentenced to their doom!
Seventeenth century dutch pirate Laurens de Graaf is also an interesting story. While he is best known for his ship, the Tigre, and for evading capture and disappearing into mystery and myth, he was supposedly an interesting pirate to work for! Known as the “gentleman’s outlaw,” de Graaf would travel the seas with an arrangement of violins and trumpets, which he would play for his crew to keep spirits high.
Samuel Bellamy’s life poses yet another interesting, though ultimately tragic, story. When treasure hunter Bellamy found it difficult to make a living, he turned to piracy. Bellamy was known as a just captain, and even formed a democracy on his ship, earning the trust and respect of his men. Bellamy was also known as the wealthiest pirate ever, and in the short year or so that he roamed the seas, he acquired over $120 million in treasure. This wealth would be short-lived, however, as Bellamy and his ship sank to the bottom of the deep blue on their way back from the heist that would have allowed his entire crew to retire and live out the rest of their lives in peace.
It is true that many of the icons we see in today’s movies, novels, and costumes come from some of history’s most well-known pirates. Nevertheless, those interested in knowing the full history and culture of what we know as “piracy” today should seek out the stories behind some of the world’s lesser-known tyrants of the sea.
The primary purpose of this passage is to
The introduction and conclusion (first and last paragraphs) of the passage claim and reiterate that “those interested in knowing the full history and culture of what we know as “piracy” today should seek out the stories behind some of the world’s lesser-known tyrants of the sea.” The body paragraphs provide examples of these less famous pirates to reinforce the claim that such pirates are also important to the history of piracy. The passage thus provides the following structure:
Paragraph one: Make the claim that less well-known pirates should also be studied
Paragraph two: Give one example of a lesser-known pirate and his history
Paragraph three: Provide a second example of a lesser-known pirate
Paragraph four: Provide a third example of a lesser-known pirate
Paragraph five: Conclude by reiterating that less well-known pirates, such as the ones above, are also important to the history of pirates
So, the passage is suggesting that less well-known pirates are also important and worth studying, as described in answer choice "suggest that less famous pirates are also important to the history of piracy."
Compare your answer with the correct one above
As technology continues to advance, relics of much earlier innovations remain in the terms we use to describe today’s tech. These terms, often referred to as “technological fossil words,” have outlived their meaning, but are still used in conversation today.
Perhaps the most well-known example of a technological fossil word is the term “DJ” or “Disc Jockey.” The term originated in a time when a DJ actually “jockeyed,” the machine playing a disc or record. Nowadays, a Disc Jockey is almost never seen with an actual disc, but the name lives on!
Technological fossil words have also found their way into the language we use to describe phone use. When operators of the original phone that coined most of the terms we use today made a call, they would “dial” by turning an actual dial of rotating numbers. When they would “hang up,” they would physically hang the phone up on the wall, at which point the phone's pressure on the latch it hung on would end the call. Even the terms phone line and cell phone refer to aspects of telephone use that no longer apply today.
One of the most interesting and lesser-known of these technological fossil words is the term “soap opera.” Today, this term refers broadly to dramatic television programs. However, the history of the term comes from the radio dramas once sponsored by soap companies to entice housewives listening in during the day to purchase their products.
From typing messages to “pen pals,” to “filming” a video, technological fossil words give us a glimpse into the history behind the tech we use today!
Which of the following would be an appropriate title for this passage?
When we look to find an appropriate title for a passage, we should think about the main idea of the passage, basically: what is it all about? For starters, it’s definitely not about actual fossils, so we can eliminate "Fossils and their origins - where do those rocks in museums really come from?". While the passage includes a paragraph that talks about the history behind the term “DJ,” that paragraph is there as an example of the passage’s topic as a whole: technological fossil words. The author doesn’t seem to think these words are a bad thing either, in fact, the author consistently refers to these terms and their origins as interesting. So, "Language blunders in technology - the importance of keeping tech terms up to date" doesn’t at all match the tone of the passage. And, while maybe you don’t always understand the “tubular” language used by your parents - that’s not what this passage is about! Technological fossil words are described as common words still in use today, despite the vanishing meanings of the words’ origins. So, "Technological fossil words - a glimpse into the history behind the terms we use today" is definitely our best bet!
Compare your answer with the correct one above
Passage 1:
Encouraging the participation of video games in children and teenagers is a dangerous practice. These video games are often violent, and thus promote violence in everyday life. Such games have also been shown to encourage violence and anger problems in those already inclined toward violence. At an age at which it is important to foster cooperation among classmates and build friendships, the isolation that comes with excessive gaming makes students more likely to enter conflicts with other students and harms their ability to socialize.
Video games have also been shown to be addictive. This trait makes gaming all the more dangerous, as exclusive focus on any one hobby can leave children without a well-rounded set of interests and skills. Those playing video games would benefit from other extracurriculars, such as arts or athletics. When children spend all their time playing video games, that leaves less time for more-productive tasks like joining a sport, learning to play an instrument, or picking up other more beneficial hobbies. Parents would be wise to discourage their children from playing video games and instead suggest they pick up a more constructive hobby.
Passage 2:
Video games are often (and unfairly) blamed for negatively impacting children, but in reality they offer many benefits to those who choose “gaming” as a hobby. Studies show that children who play video games improve their motor skills, reasoning ability, and creative problem-solving when they do so. Additionally, evidence shows us that many find playing video games to be a way to socialize with friends and even build leadership skills, including how to delegate, work as a team, and prioritize tasks. Some have even linked these higher-order thinking skills to career success down the road.
People who would villainize gaming claim that violent games make kids more violent. However, there is little, if any, evidence to show any connection between actions performed in a simulated game and tendencies in real life. In fact, many report that they find playing such games to be stress relieving, and say that these activities positively impact their mood.
While it is important to limit kids’ daily consumption of any hobby, video games can be a great way to encourage their creative problem solving, leadership, and other valuable life skills!
If Passage 1 were to appear as an opinion article in a parenting magazine, which of the following would be the most appropriate title for that article?
In order to address the most appropriate title for the article, we need to understand the primary purpose of the passage. Here, the passage is not in any way advocating for the use of video games. Instead, the author maintains a consistently negative tone regarding video games for children, and argues that “parents would be wise to discourage their children from playing video games and instead suggest they pick up a more constructive hobby.” So, while the author does address the importance of varying hobbies, and suggests that arts and athletics are examples of positive hobbies for children, the primary purpose of the passage is not to advocate for a variety of hobbies, or for arts and athletics in particular. The purpose of the passage is to warn parents against the dangers of video games and suggest they encourage children to pursue other hobbies instead.
Compare your answer with the correct one above
Passage 1:
Encouraging the participation of video games in children and teenagers is a dangerous practice. These video games are often violent, and thus promote violence in everyday life. Such games have also been shown to encourage violence and anger problems in those already inclined toward violence. At an age at which it is important to foster cooperation among classmates and build friendships, the isolation that comes with excessive gaming makes students more likely to enter conflicts with other students and harms their ability to socialize.
Video games have also been shown to be addictive. This trait makes gaming all the more dangerous, as exclusive focus on any one hobby can leave children without a well-rounded set of interests and skills. Those playing video games would benefit from other extracurriculars, such as arts or athletics. When children spend all their time playing video games, that leaves less time for more-productive tasks like joining a sport, learning to play an instrument, or picking up other more beneficial hobbies. Parents would be wise to discourage their children from playing video games and instead suggest they pick up a more constructive hobby.
Passage 2:
Video games are often (and unfairly) blamed for negatively impacting children, but in reality they offer many benefits to those who choose “gaming” as a hobby. Studies show that children who play video games improve their motor skills, reasoning ability, and creative problem-solving when they do so. Additionally, evidence shows us that many find playing video games to be a way to socialize with friends and even build leadership skills, including how to delegate, work as a team, and prioritize tasks. Some have even linked these higher-order thinking skills to career success down the road.
People who would villainize gaming claim that violent games make kids more violent. However, there is little, if any, evidence to show any connection between actions performed in a simulated game and tendencies in real life. In fact, many report that they find playing such games to be stress relieving, and say that these activities positively impact their mood.
While it is important to limit kids’ daily consumption of any hobby, video games can be a great way to encourage their creative problem solving, leadership, and other valuable life skills!
According to the context of the passage, the author of Passage 2 would be most likely to be
In this example, we want to ensure our answer incorporates both a source, and a reason, that aligns with the primary purpose of the passage. Here, the passage is attempting to address the potential positive impacts of video games for children, and seems to be addressing parents so “an advice columnist writing to parents about the often-overlooked positive effects of video games” makes sense! While some of our other answers are positive or neutral in nature (a video game advertiser promoting an upcoming game release/a researcher publishing the results of a study on the effects of video games on motor skills), they are way too narrow in scope to fit the description and purpose we’re looking for. Other answer choices completely contrast our passage (a newspaper columnist commenting on the negative impact of media on children/A doctor citing the mental effects of violent video games on children), and while “a newspaper columnist commenting on the negative impact of media on children” could potentially fit the role for Passage 1, it definitely doesn’t work as the source for Passage 2.
Compare your answer with the correct one above
When you hear the phrase “man’s best friend,” you probably think of one animal, and one animal alone: the dog. But why is that? How did dogs come to earn the name “man’s best friend,” and why has the name stuck around since?
Many historians trace the relationship between man and dog back more than 30,000 years, to when wolves used to scavenge alongside humans. Other historians cite the point when dogs and people began living together, around 15,000 years ago, as the start to this friendship.
Literature from long ago also references the friendship between man and dog, most famously in Homer’s The Odyssey. However, it wasn’t until the 1700s when King Frederick of Prussia coined the term that dogs were formally given the position “best friend to man.” Frederick referred to his friendship with his dogs in a way that was unusual at the time. While pet dogs were common for those of his rank and stature, they were normally used for hunting and protecting, and it would be considered strange to speak of them as “friends.” Frederick, however, was so fond of his dogs that he had portraits of them painted, spoke often of their loyalty, and even requested that he be buried next to them when he was laid to rest.
It is this strange but enduring relationship with “man’s best friend” that has stood the test of time. Today, dogs are often thought of for their loyalty and companionship. Studies even suggest that a canine companion can increase one’s lifespan, lower cardiovascular disease, and improve mental health. Even if you don’t share Frederick’s opinion that companionship with a dog is the only way to be truly “free of cares,” there’s no arguing that dogs have earned the title “man’s best friend” over the thousands of years they have stood by man’s side.
Which of the following best expresses the primary purpose of the passage?
The author uses this passage to describe the history behind the term, “man’s best friend.” The author’s tone does not indicate that the passage is intended to convince the reader of anything, and answers like “Describe the history of dogs scavenging with people more than 30,000 years ago” and “Provide the history of King Frederick of Prussia” are far too specific and narrow in scope. So, the purpose of this passage is to “illuminate the history behind a commonly used phrase,” “man’s best friend.”
Compare your answer with the correct one above
When you hear the phrase “man’s best friend,” you probably think of one animal, and one animal alone: the dog. But why is that? How did dogs come to earn the name “man’s best friend,” and why has the name stuck around since?
Many historians trace the relationship between man and dog back more than 30,000 years, to when wolves used to scavenge alongside humans. Other historians cite the point when dogs and people began living together, around 15,000 years ago, as the start to this friendship.
Literature from long ago also references the friendship between man and dog, most famously in Homer’s The Odyssey. However, it wasn’t until the 1700s when King Frederick of Prussia coined the term that dogs were formally given the position “best friend to man.” Frederick referred to his friendship with his dogs in a way that was unusual at the time. While pet dogs were common for those of his rank and stature, they were normally used for hunting and protecting, and it would be considered strange to speak of them as “friends.” Frederick, however, was so fond of his dogs that he had portraits of them painted, spoke often of their loyalty, and even requested that he be buried next to them when he was laid to rest.
It is this strange but enduring relationship with “man’s best friend” that has stood the test of time. Today, dogs are often thought of for their loyalty and companionship. Studies even suggest that a canine companion can increase one’s lifespan, lower cardiovascular disease, and improve mental health. Even if you don’t share Frederick’s opinion that companionship with a dog is the only way to be truly “free of cares,” there’s no arguing that dogs have earned the title “man’s best friend” over the thousands of years they have stood by man’s side.
Which of the following would be the least suitable title for this passage?
Here, any answer that aligns with the author's primary purpose of describing the history behind the phrase “man’s best friend,” makes sense as a title for the passage. The passage does not, however, debate the term in any capacity, and since we’re looking for which is the least suitable title, “Debating the term “Man’s best friend”” is our correct answer.
Compare your answer with the correct one above
Passage 1:
When schools prepare elective courses for their students (courses that provide an optional list of classes to suit different students’ interests), they should not comply with pressures to make those classes more “practical” or “career driven.” Elective courses should be a way for students to express their creativity and interests in a format they enjoy, and should provide students with a break from the mundane math and English topics they’ve spent the day learning about. Whether it’s painting, photography, dodgeball, or gardening, elective courses should be a way for students to establish and embrace hobbies and interests, a break from an otherwise full day of learning all are subjected to.
Passage 2:
Elective courses provide an opportunity for students to branch out and take different courses from those of their classmates. However, too much emphasis in school has been placed on topics that most students will never use as adults! Most students will not grow up to be artists, or to use the Pythagorean Theorem in their day-to-day lives. So, it’s only logical that elective courses should be focused on life skills students will find helpful as adults, such as personal finance and home economics. It’s never too early to build life skills that will make an individual more well-rounded as an adult!
Passage 3:
Core classes are fighting a losing battle against electives for middle and highschool-aged children. While schools mean well when they encourage students to express their creativity in class, emphasis on elective classes must come at the direct expense of core material. Schools should understand that their job is to prepare children and young adults for the workforce, and should place more emphasis on STEM (Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) material. There is currently more demand for STEM workers than there are interested and qualified adults. Therefore, if we place more emphasis on STEM skills for students, we will encourage interest in the jobs most needed when those children grow up and plan for their careers.
Which of the following best describes the primary purpose of Passage 1?
In this question, we want to address a primary purpose that aligns with the author’s final claim that “elective courses should be a way for students to establish and embrace hobbies and interests, a break from an otherwise full day of learning all are subjected to.” So, the author has established this passage to advocate for (defend) the use of elective courses as a pleasant break from an otherwise taxing school day. While dodgeball and other elective courses that might be preferred by students are mentioned in the passage, the purpose is not to argue for one of these in particular. Instead, the author wants to express to readers that electives should be focused on hobbies and interests in order to provide a break to students.
Compare your answer with the correct one above
Passage 1:
When schools prepare elective courses for their students (courses that provide an optional list of classes to suit different students’ interests), they should not comply with pressures to make those classes more “practical” or “career driven.” Elective courses should be a way for students to express their creativity and interests in a format they enjoy, and should provide students with a break from the mundane math and English topics they’ve spent the day learning about. Whether it’s painting, photography, dodgeball, or gardening, elective courses should be a way for students to establish and embrace hobbies and interests, a break from an otherwise full day of learning all are subjected to.
Passage 2:
Elective courses provide an opportunity for students to branch out and take different courses from those of their classmates. However, too much emphasis in school has been placed on topics that most students will never use as adults! Most students will not grow up to be artists, or to use the Pythagorean Theorem in their day-to-day lives. So, it’s only logical that elective courses should be focused on life skills students will find helpful as adults, such as personal finance and home economics. It’s never too early to build life skills that will make an individual more well-rounded as an adult!
Passage 3:
Core classes are fighting a losing battle against electives for middle and highschool-aged children. While schools mean well when they encourage students to express their creativity in class, emphasis on elective classes must come at the direct expense of core material. Schools should understand that their job is to prepare children and young adults for the workforce, and should place more emphasis on STEM (Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) material. There is currently more demand for STEM workers than there are interested and qualified adults. Therefore, if we place more emphasis on STEM skills for students, we will encourage interest in the jobs most needed when those children grow up and plan for their careers.
Which of the following would be an appropriate title for Passage 2?
In this passage, the author attempts to emphasize to readers that elective courses should focus on building practical “life skills students will find helpful as adults, such as personal finance and home economics.” So, it would be appropriate to title this passage “Employing electives to build practical skills in students.” Several of our wrong answers are either too specific and thus go beyond the scope of the passage (Home economics - the ultimate elective course for students/Why all classes should be electives), or address a purpose that aligns with an entirely different passage (The importance of STEM for our future workforce). Finally, the author does not at all leave the impression that elective courses are useless. Instead, the author argues their importance, but notes that they should be focused on building practical life skills.
Compare your answer with the correct one above
Passage 1:
When schools prepare elective courses for their students (courses that provide an optional list of classes to suit different students’ interests), they should not comply with pressures to make those classes more “practical” or “career driven.” Elective courses should be a way for students to express their creativity and interests in a format they enjoy, and should provide students with a break from the mundane math and English topics they’ve spent the day learning about. Whether it’s painting, photography, dodgeball, or gardening, elective courses should be a way for students to establish and embrace hobbies and interests, a break from an otherwise full day of learning all are subjected to.
Passage 2:
Elective courses provide an opportunity for students to branch out and take different courses from those of their classmates. However, too much emphasis in school has been placed on topics that most students will never use as adults! Most students will not grow up to be artists, or to use the Pythagorean Theorem in their day-to-day lives. So, it’s only logical that elective courses should be focused on life skills students will find helpful as adults, such as personal finance and home economics. It’s never too early to build life skills that will make an individual more well-rounded as an adult!
Passage 3:
Core classes are fighting a losing battle against electives for middle and highschool-aged children. While schools mean well when they encourage students to express their creativity in class, emphasis on elective classes must come at the direct expense of core material. Schools should understand that their job is to prepare children and young adults for the workforce, and should place more emphasis on STEM (Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) material. There is currently more demand for STEM workers than there are interested and qualified adults. Therefore, if we place more emphasis on STEM skills for students, we will encourage interest in the jobs most needed when those children grow up and plan for their careers.
According to the context of the passage, Passage 3 would most likely be found in
The author of Passage 3 is clearly advocating for more class time focused on STEM skills to prepare today’s youth for future career demand. So, “an educational opinion journal expressing opinions on class curriculum and learning priorities” would make sense as a source for this passage. While “a technical journal for STEM experts focused on best practices in advanced mathematics” sounds on topic, it’s definitely not aligned with the purpose or scope of this passage. Additionally, “a letter from a teacher to the school board detailing why more emphasis should be placed on visual arts,” “a petition written and signed by students who are sick of taking so many math classes and want more variety in their school days,” and “a proposal from a home economics teacher asking for more funding for the home economics department” all prioritize opinions held in other passages in this passage set, but certainly not the opinion of the author of Passage 3.
Compare your answer with the correct one above