Institutional Relationships - AP US Government
Card 0 of 20
Who is the only man to have served as both President and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court?
Who is the only man to have served as both President and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court?
The only man to serve as both President and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court was William H. Taft. Taft became President following the end of Theodore Roosevelt’s Presidency, but had always favored a position on the Supreme Court and was something of a reluctant President. He lasted only one term as President and was granted his wish to be Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in 1921, when he was nominated by President Harding. He would serve as Chief Justice for nine years until his ill health forced him to step down shortly before his death. As a Chief Justice Taft, encouraged the Judiciary Act of 1925, which expanded the Supreme Court’s power to give priority to cases that they considered of national importance.
The only man to serve as both President and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court was William H. Taft. Taft became President following the end of Theodore Roosevelt’s Presidency, but had always favored a position on the Supreme Court and was something of a reluctant President. He lasted only one term as President and was granted his wish to be Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in 1921, when he was nominated by President Harding. He would serve as Chief Justice for nine years until his ill health forced him to step down shortly before his death. As a Chief Justice Taft, encouraged the Judiciary Act of 1925, which expanded the Supreme Court’s power to give priority to cases that they considered of national importance.
Compare your answer with the correct one above
The War Powers Act of 1973 was designed to __________.
The War Powers Act of 1973 was designed to __________.
The War Powers Act of 1973 was designed to eliminate the president’s ability to unilaterally declare war or commit the armed forces without the prescribed support of Congress. It was issued in response to the United States’ prolonged involvement in Korea and Vietnam, both conflicts that occurred without a formal declaration of war being issued by Congress.
The War Powers Act of 1973 was designed to eliminate the president’s ability to unilaterally declare war or commit the armed forces without the prescribed support of Congress. It was issued in response to the United States’ prolonged involvement in Korea and Vietnam, both conflicts that occurred without a formal declaration of war being issued by Congress.
Compare your answer with the correct one above
Executive privilege __________.
Executive privilege __________.
Executive privilege allows the president and other important members of the Executive branch to withhold information from, and refuse to testify to, Congress. It is most relevant in U.S. History to the refusal of Richard Nixon to provide certain evidence to Congress during his trial over the Watergate incident.
Executive privilege allows the president and other important members of the Executive branch to withhold information from, and refuse to testify to, Congress. It is most relevant in U.S. History to the refusal of Richard Nixon to provide certain evidence to Congress during his trial over the Watergate incident.
Compare your answer with the correct one above
Judicial review is __________.
Judicial review is __________.
Judicial review establishes that the judicial branch of the government has the right to analyze the constitutionality of certain actions undertaken by the legislative and executive branches of government. It is part of the checks and balances aspect of American government that ensures that no one branch of the United States government can wield absolute power at the expense of the other two branches.
Judicial review establishes that the judicial branch of the government has the right to analyze the constitutionality of certain actions undertaken by the legislative and executive branches of government. It is part of the checks and balances aspect of American government that ensures that no one branch of the United States government can wield absolute power at the expense of the other two branches.
Compare your answer with the correct one above
The alleged "corrupt-bargain" denied which politician the Presidency?
The alleged "corrupt-bargain" denied which politician the Presidency?
In the 1824 election none of the major candidates gained a clear majority; however, Andrew Jackson and John Quincy Adams emerged as the two leading candidates in the popular vote. Due to the lack of a clear winner, the election had to be decided in the House of Representatives. Henry Clay, himself a candidate in the election, allegedly offered his support to John Quincy Adams, helping him win the Presidency, In exchange, Clay was made Adams’ Secretary of State. Andrew Jackson would campaign, partially, on the platform of the "corrupt-bargain" in the next election, 1828.
In the 1824 election none of the major candidates gained a clear majority; however, Andrew Jackson and John Quincy Adams emerged as the two leading candidates in the popular vote. Due to the lack of a clear winner, the election had to be decided in the House of Representatives. Henry Clay, himself a candidate in the election, allegedly offered his support to John Quincy Adams, helping him win the Presidency, In exchange, Clay was made Adams’ Secretary of State. Andrew Jackson would campaign, partially, on the platform of the "corrupt-bargain" in the next election, 1828.
Compare your answer with the correct one above
In a Unified Government __________.
In a Unified Government __________.
In a Unified Government, in contrast to a Divided Government, the Legislative and Executive Branches are both controlled by the same party. This allows much more legislation to get passed. In a Divided Government, one of the parties controls Congress and the other controls the Presidency. This often leads to gridlock.
In a Unified Government, in contrast to a Divided Government, the Legislative and Executive Branches are both controlled by the same party. This allows much more legislation to get passed. In a Divided Government, one of the parties controls Congress and the other controls the Presidency. This often leads to gridlock.
Compare your answer with the correct one above
Which of these best describes a coalition government?
Which of these best describes a coalition government?
A coalition government occurs more often in Parliamentary systems than it does in the American system, but it has occurred previously on rare occasions throughout American history. A coalition government occurs when a group of smaller parties or interest groups work together and combine their representation in order to form a majority in Congress.
A coalition government occurs more often in Parliamentary systems than it does in the American system, but it has occurred previously on rare occasions throughout American history. A coalition government occurs when a group of smaller parties or interest groups work together and combine their representation in order to form a majority in Congress.
Compare your answer with the correct one above
A Legislative grants of money to finance a specific government program are called __________
A Legislative grants of money to finance a specific government program are called __________
The name given to a Legislative grant of money to finance a specific government program is "appropriations."
The name given to a Legislative grant of money to finance a specific government program is "appropriations."
Compare your answer with the correct one above
Which of these best describes the process by which the President can be removed from office?
Which of these best describes the process by which the President can be removed from office?
A President can be impeached only under very specific circumstances. First the House must vote for impeachment by a simple majority, but, this simply states that the President must stand trial, so the case moves to the Senate, where the trial takes place. A two-thirds vote is needed in the Senate to remove the President from office.
A President can be impeached only under very specific circumstances. First the House must vote for impeachment by a simple majority, but, this simply states that the President must stand trial, so the case moves to the Senate, where the trial takes place. A two-thirds vote is needed in the Senate to remove the President from office.
Compare your answer with the correct one above
Which of these Presidents came within one vote in the Senate of being impeached and forcibly removed from office?
Which of these Presidents came within one vote in the Senate of being impeached and forcibly removed from office?
Andrew Johnson was the President who had to deal with the reunification of the North and South during the inaugural years of Reconstruction. In 1867, Congress passed the Tenure of Office Act, which prohibited the President from removing his own appointed officials from office. Johnson ignored this act when he removed his secretary of war and replaced him with Ulysses S. Grant. He was impeached by the House as a result, and was almost removed from office, surviving the trial in the Senate by one vote.
Andrew Johnson was the President who had to deal with the reunification of the North and South during the inaugural years of Reconstruction. In 1867, Congress passed the Tenure of Office Act, which prohibited the President from removing his own appointed officials from office. Johnson ignored this act when he removed his secretary of war and replaced him with Ulysses S. Grant. He was impeached by the House as a result, and was almost removed from office, surviving the trial in the Senate by one vote.
Compare your answer with the correct one above
In American politics, who is involved in an iron triangle?
In American politics, who is involved in an iron triangle?
An iron triangle involves the policy-making relationship among a Congressional committee, the bureaucracy, and an interest group. The committee provides funding and political support to the bureaucracy, the bureaucracy provides low regulation and special favors to the interest group, and the interest group provides electoral support to the committee. In return, the bureaucracy provides policy choices and execution to the committee, the committee provides friendly legislation and oversight to the interest group, and the interest group provides congressional support (via lobbying) to the bureaucracy.
An iron triangle involves the policy-making relationship among a Congressional committee, the bureaucracy, and an interest group. The committee provides funding and political support to the bureaucracy, the bureaucracy provides low regulation and special favors to the interest group, and the interest group provides electoral support to the committee. In return, the bureaucracy provides policy choices and execution to the committee, the committee provides friendly legislation and oversight to the interest group, and the interest group provides congressional support (via lobbying) to the bureaucracy.
Compare your answer with the correct one above
Yearly limits set by Congress on what an agency can spend are called __________.
Yearly limits set by Congress on what an agency can spend are called __________.
Annual authorizations are budgets established by Congress for various government agencies on a yearly basis.
Annual authorizations are budgets established by Congress for various government agencies on a yearly basis.
Compare your answer with the correct one above
In which of the following ways did Franklin Delano Roosevelt take action after the Supreme Court kept striking down laws during the New Deal era?
In which of the following ways did Franklin Delano Roosevelt take action after the Supreme Court kept striking down laws during the New Deal era?
This is an incredibly interesting story. Essentially, there were four justices on the Supreme Court, Butler, McReynolds, Sutherland, and Van Devanter, who were extremely conservative. They always voted in a bloc, and nearly always voted to strike down FDRs New Deal legislation. This earned them the name “the Four Horsemen.” Since they always voted in a bloc (and there were four of them) it took only one other justice to disagree with the legislation to cobble together a majority and strike the law down. During the beginning of the New Deal era, this happened relatively frequently, much to FDR’s chagrin.
Seeing no end in sight, and getting more frustrated by the day, FDR managed to come up with what he thought was a solution: get Congress to pass a bill that added more members to the Supreme Court. As President, he could appoint them, and since Congress was overwhelmingly Democrat, the Senate would likely confirm his appointees.
So, FDR comes up with a plan for a bill: craft a piece of legislation under the ruse of helping the poor, old, enfeebled members of the Supreme Court. His “subtle” bill would have allowed him to appoint 1 new associate justice for every justice over the age of 70 years, up to a total of 6 additional members. Nearly everyone saw the bill for what it was, and it quickly earned the derisive moniker of the “court packing plan,” as it would have allowed him to “pack” the court with like-minded justices, and thus his New Deal legislation would pass. It didn’t pass Congress.
This is an incredibly interesting story. Essentially, there were four justices on the Supreme Court, Butler, McReynolds, Sutherland, and Van Devanter, who were extremely conservative. They always voted in a bloc, and nearly always voted to strike down FDRs New Deal legislation. This earned them the name “the Four Horsemen.” Since they always voted in a bloc (and there were four of them) it took only one other justice to disagree with the legislation to cobble together a majority and strike the law down. During the beginning of the New Deal era, this happened relatively frequently, much to FDR’s chagrin.
Seeing no end in sight, and getting more frustrated by the day, FDR managed to come up with what he thought was a solution: get Congress to pass a bill that added more members to the Supreme Court. As President, he could appoint them, and since Congress was overwhelmingly Democrat, the Senate would likely confirm his appointees.
So, FDR comes up with a plan for a bill: craft a piece of legislation under the ruse of helping the poor, old, enfeebled members of the Supreme Court. His “subtle” bill would have allowed him to appoint 1 new associate justice for every justice over the age of 70 years, up to a total of 6 additional members. Nearly everyone saw the bill for what it was, and it quickly earned the derisive moniker of the “court packing plan,” as it would have allowed him to “pack” the court with like-minded justices, and thus his New Deal legislation would pass. It didn’t pass Congress.
Compare your answer with the correct one above
What individual or body has the power to offer “advice and consent,” thereby having the power to approve, presidential appointments?
What individual or body has the power to offer “advice and consent,” thereby having the power to approve, presidential appointments?
The Supreme Court and the Cabinet are two bodies appointed by the President, and so they do not have the power to approve these appointments. The House of Representatives and the Vice President also do not have this power. The power to offer “advice and consent” on the issue of presidential appointments is reserved by the Senate, according to Article 2, Section 2 of the Constitution.
The Supreme Court and the Cabinet are two bodies appointed by the President, and so they do not have the power to approve these appointments. The House of Representatives and the Vice President also do not have this power. The power to offer “advice and consent” on the issue of presidential appointments is reserved by the Senate, according to Article 2, Section 2 of the Constitution.
Compare your answer with the correct one above
The line-item refers to the President's power to ____________.
The line-item refers to the President's power to ____________.
A line-item veto is when the President simply vetoes a portion of a piece of proposed legislation, and then sends it back to Congress for approval. This way the whole piece does not have to be redrafted, and legislators simply have to agree on whether the portion vetoed is necessary or not.
A line-item veto is when the President simply vetoes a portion of a piece of proposed legislation, and then sends it back to Congress for approval. This way the whole piece does not have to be redrafted, and legislators simply have to agree on whether the portion vetoed is necessary or not.
Compare your answer with the correct one above
What is the structural power balance between the Legislative Branch, the Executive Branch, and the Judicial Branch?
What is the structural power balance between the Legislative Branch, the Executive Branch, and the Judicial Branch?
The system of checks and balances is the way that the U.S. government balances power between the executive, judicial, and legislative branches. It is known as such because of the way that each branch is able to check the others and balance them out if one gains too much power over another.
The system of checks and balances is the way that the U.S. government balances power between the executive, judicial, and legislative branches. It is known as such because of the way that each branch is able to check the others and balance them out if one gains too much power over another.
Compare your answer with the correct one above
The Constitution requires the “advice and consent” of the __________ when ___________.
The Constitution requires the “advice and consent” of the __________ when ___________.
The Constitution specifically requires the “advice and consent” (that’s the actual language, hence the quotation marks) of the Senate when ratification of a treaty is at hand. In other words, in order for our country to successfully reach a treaty with another country, the Senate must give their “advice and consent.” In slightly more concrete terms, the Senate must approve (or ‘ratify’) the treaty by a supermajority (
vote). This, as you can imagine, is a rather difficult task. It has caused the embarrassment of one President in particular: Woodrow Wilson. Woodrow Wilson failed to gain Senate approval of the Treaty of Versailles, and his brainchild, the League of Nations. This was rather embarrassing to President Wilson, as he had essentially stumped around Europe campaigning for the League of Nations only to have his own country fail to back him.
The Constitution specifically requires the “advice and consent” (that’s the actual language, hence the quotation marks) of the Senate when ratification of a treaty is at hand. In other words, in order for our country to successfully reach a treaty with another country, the Senate must give their “advice and consent.” In slightly more concrete terms, the Senate must approve (or ‘ratify’) the treaty by a supermajority (
Compare your answer with the correct one above
Although, technically speaking, the President’s power to wage war is checked by Congress’s ability to declare it, Congress has attempted to further check the President by the passage of which of the following?
Although, technically speaking, the President’s power to wage war is checked by Congress’s ability to declare it, Congress has attempted to further check the President by the passage of which of the following?
This is an interesting, and somewhat convoluted question. As the prompt says, the President’s ability to wage war is technically checked by Congress’ ability to declare war (i.e. ONLY Congress can declare war). That said, there have been a total of 0 declared wars since WWII. Yes, you read that correctly, zero. What about Korea, Vietnam, Kuwait, etc etc?
The answer lies in the President’s ability to direct troop movement (as the Commander-in-chief). Very long story short, the president can technically skirt the issue of a declared war by directing troops to go somewhere and intervene—this is often called an “armed conflict.”
Congress attempted to reign in the President’s unfettered ability to create/aid in armed conflicts by passing the War Powers Act of 1973, which imposed various procedural hurdles on a President attempting to move troops for that purpose.
This is an interesting, and somewhat convoluted question. As the prompt says, the President’s ability to wage war is technically checked by Congress’ ability to declare war (i.e. ONLY Congress can declare war). That said, there have been a total of 0 declared wars since WWII. Yes, you read that correctly, zero. What about Korea, Vietnam, Kuwait, etc etc?
The answer lies in the President’s ability to direct troop movement (as the Commander-in-chief). Very long story short, the president can technically skirt the issue of a declared war by directing troops to go somewhere and intervene—this is often called an “armed conflict.”
Congress attempted to reign in the President’s unfettered ability to create/aid in armed conflicts by passing the War Powers Act of 1973, which imposed various procedural hurdles on a President attempting to move troops for that purpose.
Compare your answer with the correct one above
___________ is where both the President and a majority of both chambers of Congress belong to the same political party.
___________ is where both the President and a majority of both chambers of Congress belong to the same political party.
This should have been a relatively simple question. When both the president and the majority of both chambers of congress belong to the same political party, we refer to this as “unified government.” The name, of course, makes sense, because—as they’re both of the same party—government is unified. Whenever government is unified, there’s a greater chance of increased legislation and reform (do you see why?).
This should have been a relatively simple question. When both the president and the majority of both chambers of congress belong to the same political party, we refer to this as “unified government.” The name, of course, makes sense, because—as they’re both of the same party—government is unified. Whenever government is unified, there’s a greater chance of increased legislation and reform (do you see why?).
Compare your answer with the correct one above
________________ is where the President and either one or both chambers of Congress are of different political parties.
________________ is where the President and either one or both chambers of Congress are of different political parties.
This should have been a relatively simple question. Divided government is the exact opposite of unified government—not too shocking, given the name. Because both the president and either one or both chambers of Congress are of two different political parties, it becomes much more difficult to create and pass legislation, leading to gridlock.
This should have been a relatively simple question. Divided government is the exact opposite of unified government—not too shocking, given the name. Because both the president and either one or both chambers of Congress are of two different political parties, it becomes much more difficult to create and pass legislation, leading to gridlock.
Compare your answer with the correct one above