They were designed to be seen from the outside, where they emphasized balance over mystery

They were designed to be increasingly more beautiful as the worshiper went deeper into the temple area

They were designed by competing architects, each trying to outdo the previous in scale and design

They were only made of stone

They were built as gathering places for worshipers

While the Greeks did use arches it was mainly in below ground construction, not temples

The arch wasn’t invented until Roman times

Arches were considered profane because of their practicality, so they were not used to build places of worship

Early arches were poorly made and, while the Greeks used them, none have survived until today

Arches have to be made out of brick, not marble, so they could not be used in temple construction

The Greeks sought beauty based on mathematical proportions

The Greeks used size to determine the importance of a building

The Greeks used the same style for all their temples

The all the great Greek architectural projects were for tombs and places of worship

Greek architecture was developed entirely independent of Egyptian architecture

Proportion mattered more than size to the Greeks; the temples needed to be proportioned to those who used them

The prevalence of earthquakes in Greece forced the Greeks to focus on smaller, more achievable projects

Egyptian temples were carved into rock, so size was less of an issue

The Greek economy couldn’t support large building projects

The stone used by the Greeks wasn’t strong enough for larger structures

Greek temples were meant to be viewed on all sides, while Roman temples were to be viewed from the front

Greek temples had columns with slight bulges, while roman ones did not

Greek temples never veered from the established orders, while Roman temples were more varied

Roman temples were also used as marketplaces

Roman temples were built on the ruins of previous structures

The surviving sculpture and architecture is white, but would have actually been brightly colored.

The surviving pieces do not demonstrate properly the opulence of the empire.

The sculpture that remains undervalues the importance Greek senators held in the community.

The architecture that remains does not properly demonstrate the depth of Greek commitment to their polytheistic religion.

None of the other answers is correct.

were still strongly influenced by wooden temple design

were unstable and tended to collapse, leading to a new design: the Ionic temple

doubled as meeting places of governing bodies

were built without a sense of proportion

emphasized tall and slender architecture

grew taller and had more slender

grew shorter and more refined

were simplified; most of the ornamentation was moved to the architrave

were removed from the sides of the temple, and only used on the front and rear

were no longer designed according to the 3 standard categories or orders

It is made entirely of marble and is the first fully Ionic temple on the acropolis.

It has a cult statue of Artemis as well as Athena.

It was supposedly built at the site at which Zeus's thunderbolt struck the ground.

Only priestesses were permitted to enter, and it was the site of female worship.

It housed an altar for animal sacrifice and was said to constantly burn incense.

Alternating triglyphs and metopes in the frieze

A tiered base at the bottom of the column

A decorative and often elaborate volute

Relief sculpture running the length of the frieze

A narrow and stylized column